the fact of mind is the fact of reflection
and we can regard it - this meta fact
in a number of possible ways -
we can i.e. - adopt a purely subjective view
(Descartes / Berkeley)
or - an objective view - objective idealism -
re Hegel
such reflections -
on the meta fact of reflection
are not however fundamental -
they are derivative
derivative of the fact
and so - what can be said of this meta fact?
the point is to refrain from characterization
such as subjective and objective descriptions
(as above)
such are definitive
choices of definition
and therefore - secondary - reflective
the point of stating - the meta fact
is to state it - non-reflectively
it is - reflectivity - but we do not need to
reflect on this (meta fact) in stating it
but how then is it to be characterized - stated?
as a primitive - I think
that is without characterization
it is - as I am putting it
meta neutral
in a sense if you like an empty fact or an open fact
