29.4.06

what do you perceive?

when you perceive - and ask the question -
the philosophical question - what do I perceive? -
the answer is of course reflective - after the fact -
and is what?

the idea that we can speak of the image of an object
and the object itself (the ground
of the image)

what is - what is perceived

both these dimensions - are the result of reflection -

after the fact -

and this reflection is necessary for knowing - knowledge

is not all knowledge - reflective?

and my point here is that the awareness of x (as it were
pre-reflective) is pure and undefined - in that it is
non-reflective -

the experience is without knowledge - pre-knowledge

the awareness - I say is noumenal

this is not quite the Kantian sense - in that Kant
I think regarded the noumenal as analytical - or reflective -
and the phenomenal as the presentation

here I suggest the noumenal is the presentation

what is presented is the unknown

reflection - and the phenomenal?

do we want to say here that the phenomenal is reflective -
post presentation -

yes I think so -

my idea is that -

the connection of things - even persons and non-persons
(perceivers and their objects of perception) - would be
included here - is - purely existential - primitive -

any definition of this is after the fact and - reflective

so pure experience is of the unknown

is noumenal

mind - enables the reflection that is experience -
that is knowledge

the world reflects in mind

the mind reflects the world

it is not hard to conceive a world without this -
reflection

no experience - no knowledge

it is this world - the unknown that we are fundamentally
connected to

the mind is the reflection of this

the reflection - after the fact - of connection -

of - existence

so the philosopher's stone - the unknown

NB

it goes without saying that this argument is an
argument of reflection

it is - as it were a reflective return to the
non-reflective

paradoxically - if you like - a return to the
ground of reflection - the ground of mind

it is to say we can know - that the basis of the
known is the unknown

knowledge - knowing it's origin - its reason -
is not knowing the inside of itself - it is
knowing the outside of itself - what it is not -
the unknown