1.5.06

the problem of knowledge in not the problem of existence

existence is given

how to understand existence is not

is not a given

the question of understanding is the mind reflecting

it is reflection on what is given

what is given is not known

reflection is the knowing

knowledge is characterization of the given -

of the given unknown

how do we characterize what this is -

the characterization of the unknown?

epistemology - is reflection on -

the reflection that is knowing - that is knowledge

there is a necessity about it

it is not as if we choose to know

we must know

knowing is our fundamental activity as human beings

we cannot - do not operate without it

still to characterize the unknown is to what?

it is the question of how best to describe what is
presented

again - the presentation is for all intents and
purposes - necessary

the world we see as human beings -

in its basics is presented

to know it is to conceive it

(conception here is natural - it is what we do)

however the mind does not come to the presentation -
fixed

the basis of conception is uncertainty

presentation is clear

but reflection uncertain

reflection is the process of uncertainty

it is grounded in uncertainty

the mind is essentially - uncertainty

any conception that is ventured

is by its nature uncertain

this is the ground of theory - any theory -
any conception

the basis of this uncertainty - is possibility

the mind brings possibility to the world

knowledge is the expression of this possibility

and the world without mind - without knowledge

what can we say?

I say we don't know

however the fact of the world -

as a primitive

unknown - but primitive

suggests a view

that the world is without possibility

without mind that is

no questions in nature

only if mind

so - overall?

mind in the world -

an indeterminacy

as a fact of

nature

a contingency

and if so -

(and so it seems)

a necessary fact?

well as necessary as any fact

any event or class thereof

before we get ahead of ourselves

good to remember that 'contingency' and 'necessity'
are conceptions

conceptions

of

the unknown

it is always tempting to get above your status and
to speak from the pulpit - sub specie aeternitatis -
as it were

and to imagine you can conceive the totality and
its status

however this is bad logic - or fantasy

beyond what we know - and this is uncertain -
is the unknown

and here you - necessarily - come to an end of
characterization

or if you like the reason for it