7.2.07

what can we know here?

awareness is awareness of

I say the outside world -
(outside that is of consciousness)

and consciousness is aware of itself

therefore the inside world -

one point -

we are not aware of the relationship between consciousness and the external world

if I am right here it is worth some thought

we are - I am saying simply aware of - the objects of consciousness - internal
and external

the question of the relation emerges post event

in response to the reflective separating out and - or division of awareness
into dimensions and the question of their unity - how can different realities
(mind and matter) interact?

I say they are not different substances - so it is not a question of how does
one substance of a particular nature - relate to - connect to another - of a different nature

fair enough question - if the issue is substance

what we know is that mind is inside matter

a dimension of matter?

or matter is the outside of mind - a dimension of mind?

the whole - here the conscious human being - is not one dimension or the other -

the human being - the entity as a whole is unknown - non-classifiable -

except in the dimensions of its unity

the dimensions - or dimensional definition is not a substantial issue -
rather it is logical - formal

x has an inside and an outside -

we call the inside consciousness - the outside matter

so on this view - it does not make sense to speak of the inside of anything interacting with the outside

the entity as a unity - a singularity - acts

we begin here

any division into - mental and physical

is analytical - and hence theoretical - reflective - removed from the realm of action -

and why go there?

for good reasons - practical reasons

given some of the difficulties we face as human beings

so I am saying human action is ontologically singular

we are aware of what we do

we reflect on this

but this after the act

reflecting on the relation between the internal and external will tell us what?

that the internal is inside - the external is outside

won't tell us much

if we are looking for a causal connection - one way or the other -

what we are asking for is - what we are presuming is that -

the inside causes the outside - the outside causes the inside

the inside an effect -

the outside an effect -

a misapplication - use of the idea - the category of cause

put simply - cause and effect is a surface category

tempting yes to say everything has a cause

the point is you have to choose your cause

not everything is related to everything else in terms of cause and effect

the inside does not cause the outside - or visa versa - of anything -