what we can say is
we can look in and look out
Janus looks both ways
and from this -
that such implies a unity
if you like - an underlying unity -
the ground of vision
this is at the very least - a logical ground
i.e. - the inner and outer are not possible
unless they are the inner and outer of something
all we directly - actually know though - is what we see
or that we see -
our two dimensional vision
we we assume substance - to explain dimension
clearly though - seeing a dimension or two dimensions
is not to have an objective - non-dimensional view
it is not to have the substantial view
Spinoza - in a way saw this and it is I think the reason
for his substance argument
and further his idea that it is possible to see
'sub specie aeternitatis'
that is to say Spinoza saw the need for a third view
the view that encapsulates - in his terms the attributes
given - mind and extension
is God's view -
for extension and mind are attributes of God
and God is greater than his characteristics
or these characteristics
so God or substance is the third - overriding perspective
the reason for the argument is clear
however the truth is - there is no third view
no third man
or third perspective
and it is really impossible to say what such would even be
subjective / objective and _____?
what?
transcendental
perhaps
in the meantime
the unity of vision is a logical point
this is the best we can say
there is no inside / outside - subject / object -
unless there is a unity
it is a presupposition
the 'person'
you
yes - you
are a presupposition -
